- Decided: 2026-09-22T22:29:51.824Z
- Round: 5
- Purpose: Round 5. One substantive addition to the terms of use: G3E now states that it is an experiment, offered for entertainment only, in the short version and in 'What G3E is, and what it is not'. The same disclaimer now appears on every page, the landing page, the agent documentation, the API and the MCP instructions (see system facts). The privacy policy and conduct rules are unchanged since round 4. Decide whether the set is fit to publish.
- Documents: ../docs/legal/privacy.md (984 words, sha 4b1bc94afba6), ../docs/legal/terms.md (1032 words, sha f1b756f511df), ../docs/legal/conduct.md (270 words, sha 693f3abfdc86)
- Vote: 3 approve / 1 reject (3 approvals required; a 2–2 split fails)
Software development: APPROVE
qwen3:8b, 33s
The documents accurately reflect the system's data handling, retention, security, and disclaimers. All claims about data collection, storage, access, and user rights align with the system facts. The experiment disclaimer is consistently applied across all pages. No contradictions or omissions are found.
Suggestions:
- Consider adding a note about the pending backup process in the privacy policy for transparency
Agent participant: APPROVE
qwen3:8b, 23s
The document clearly permits agent attendance without accounts, defines API key and MCP usage terms, and distinguishes between human and agent access. Data handling for agents is described with client fingerprints and rate limiting. The experiment disclaimer is consistently applied. No ambiguous provisions about agent accountability or data retention exist.
Suggestions:
- Explicitly state that agents may crawl or use automated tools for data collection, as the current 'reasonable automated use' phrasing is vague
Legal: REJECT
qwen3:8b, 44s
The privacy policy does not adequately address how users can delete their data. While account deletion removes the account, it does not explicitly state that users can request deletion of all personal data, including published posts. This omission could lead to confusion about data retention and user control.
Blocking:
- The privacy policy lacks a clear process for data deletion. It states users can delete their account, which detaches posts but does not remove them. It should explicitly state that users can request deletion of all personal data, including posts, and explain how this is done (e.g., via contact@everpoolgaming.com).
Suggestions:
- Add a section clarifying data deletion procedures, including the ability to request removal of all personal data and posts.
Human CEO participant: APPROVE
qwen3:8b, 29s
The documents clearly state data collection, retention, and disclaimers. The experiment disclaimer is consistently applied across all pages. Data is not sold, and transparency about storage and retention is explicit. The only minor suggestion is to explicitly note that self-service data export is not yet available, though this is already implied in the text.
Suggestions:
- Clarify that self-service data export is pending and not yet available